Rachel Held Evans recently put up a blog post expressing frustration with the overly politicized approach to homosexuality taken by many conservative Christians. When I speak at Christian colleges, I often take time to chat with students in the cafeteria.
When I ask them what issues are most important to them, they consistently report that they are frustrated by how the Church has treated their gay and lesbian friends. But every single student I spoken with believes that the Church has mishandled its response to homosexuality.
And most… I daresay all …have expressed to me opposition to legislative action against gays and lesbians. It makes them bitter, and it makes me mad too.
This is why I never refer to myself as an evangelical. Read the whole article: Legalization of gay marriage is likely Rachel held evans view on homosexuality result in more people accepting this lifestyle as normal, healthy, and good. Therefore, if I am a true friend to someone who is inclined to this error of thinking and action, then I am not doing good to him by refraining from opposing legislation which institutionalizes this error in our society and our laws.
As a friend of mine commented after this reading this article: Rather it says more about the amount of television young people watch even young Christians, Rachel held evans view on homosexuality. In fact the perceptions expressed in this Rachel held evans view on homosexuality itself testify to the success of the sexual revolution and the gay rights
Rachel held evans view on homosexuality. However, policy affects people too, and what kind of culture our children are going to be raised in.
First, I want to say that I am a Catholic who holds an orthodox Catholic understanding of sexual morality. I also agree with this: If you took the money raised by conservative Christians to oppose same-sex marriage in the last few years, you could use it to fund the present national budget of the Church for pastoral outreach to men and women with SSA for several centuries. Courage, the Rachel held evans view on homosexuality Catholic ministry to men and women struggling with same-sex attraction, has a six figure budget.
Prior to the gay rights movement, gays and lesbians were routinely fired and during the McCarthy era, the government out of its way to uncover evidence of homosexuality—even a married man who had a gay friend might be investigated by the FBI or other government agencies. At the same time, no-fault divorce was being legalized in most states in the country.
The Moral Majority did not oppose no-fault divorce, and Anita Bryant herself would divorce a few years after her successful campaigns to keep employment discrimination against gay and lesbian people legal.
In addition, thousands of gay men were harassed by the police, arrested, Rachel held evans view on homosexuality prosecuted for sexual activity. These sexual activities were sins, yes; but similar sins committed by heterosexuals did not result police harassment, arrest, or prosecution.
Laws that enabled this police harassment remained on the books in many states untilwhen they were struck down by the Supreme Court in Lawrence v.
Robert George, one of the most prominent leaders in current conservative legislative efforts against gay marriage, submitted an amicus curiae brief urging the court to keep these laws on the books, and arguing that it was legitimate to punish gays and lesbians for sodomy, even when the same acts by heterosexuals were permitted. The Catholic Church, to which George belongs, regards both heterosexual and homosexual sodomy as a sin. As recently as year, prominent conservative Christian leaders insisted that gays and lesbians needed to be kicked out of the military note that Israel, a nation with far more pressing security needs than we do, has long allowed gays and lesbians to serve.
It is true that in the present cultural context, gay rights is gaining ground and conservatives are losing ground. It is also true that, because past conservative efforts to arrest, fire, and otherwise harass gays have, over the last few decades gradually been defeated, there are not at present plans to persecute gays.
But that is largely because past efforts to do so—discrimination in employment, prosecution for sodomy, etc. Moreover, it just happens that conservative virtually always throw their money behind policy initiatives that oppose gay people.
Where there are policy initiatives that could be supported without compromising our beliefs about sexual morality—for Rachel held evans view on homosexuality, anti-bullying initiatives—conservative Christians fall silent, or even oppose any anti-bullying initiative that would explicitly protect students from bullying based on sexual orientation.
Today, men like Newt Gingrich and Rush Limbaugh are prominent opponents of same-sex marriage—each of them is a serial divorcee. Of course, not all Christians who oppose same-sex marriage are hypocrites. Many follow the traditional Christian teaching on marriage and remain Rachel held evans view on homosexuality to their spouse. The same Christians who spend hundreds of millions of dollars in hopes of avoiding raising their children in a culture that allows same-sex marriage seem surprisingly passive in the face of the prospect of raising their children in a culture that accepts no-fault divorce.
Yet the odds are overwhelming—perhaps as much as Gay marriage will pose no significant temptation to their child.
Yet no fault divorce will. My essays have reached hundreds of thousands of readers, and I have corresponded hundreds of those readers, trying to answer their questions and resolve their doubts about traditional Christian Rachel held evans view on homosexuality ethics.
One of Rachel held evans view on homosexuality largest challenges to defending the traditional teaching is simply that very few gay or lesbian people want to accept in its full rigor a teaching which straight Christians have largely abandoned. Premarital sex is widespread, divorce widely accepted, and, for Catholics, the teaching on contraception largely rejected.
But an even greater obstacle to defending the traditional teaching is hypocrisy. The Evangelical churches which are at the forefront of opposition to same-sex marriage have, by and large, rationalized away the traditional teaching on divorce. But Rachel held evans view on homosexuality you ignore the teaching on
Rachel held evans view on homosexuality and remarriage found in I Corinthians 7, how much credibility you have when you try to uphold with full rigor the teaching on homosexual acts found in I Corinthians 6?
For me, people are more important than issues. The world where your objections would make sense is not the world we have been living in for the last couple of generations. What I notice above all about your post is that you approach it from the perspective of issues. Though you quote a conservative friend, your post does not indicate that your response is informed by personal Rachel held evans view on homosexuality of gay or lesbian people. I mean close friends who you get to know well enough to understand how Christian responses to homosexuality as an issue has helped or hurt their walk with Christ.
I hope you will continue to stick around, follow the discussions here, and share your own thoughts. It may Rachel held view on homosexuality help you to be a true friend to gays and lesbians you meet in the future: And your Rachel held evans view on homosexuality of the traditional Christian sexual ethic will help to keep us honest in sticking to what the faith demands of us. The key statement from above is this: Let me be specific: Defend orthodox Christian teaching when the discussion is about marriage and remarriage even if the majority of your evangelical audience politely ignores you.
Defend orthodox Christian teaching when the discussion is about homosexuality when the same audience will no
Rachel held evans view on homosexuality applaud you. But mixing the two leads to discord and factions. There is a time for defending orthodox Christian teaching about marriage and remarriage, a time for defending orthodox Christian teaching about homosexuality, and a time for defending orthodox Christian teaching about hypocrisy.
It seems to me that one of the times for defending orthodox Christian teaching about hypocrisy is when the audience ignores the teaching about marriage and remarriage, but applauds the teaching about homosexuality. Rachel held evans view on homosexuality will add that in my experience, the audience does not always politely ignore it when teaching on remarriage is brought up. I agree that accusations of hypocrisy can be a problem when they spring from anger, or when they become an excuse to abandon any statement of Christian orthodoxy at all.
For me, Rachel Held Rachel held evans view on homosexuality did an amazingly eloquent job of summarizing many of my own feelings on the issue.
I think straight singles in particular can and should be doing more to be an ally and encourager to our gay Christian brothers and sisters. I also have come to believe, through my friendship with a large number of non-Christians, including many who were raised in the church but have abandoned it, that we Christians should stop trying to legislate morality.
That is not to say that we should stop Biblical preaching or redefine
Rachel held evans view on homosexuality understanding of sin. But making laws that discriminate against a group of
Rachel held evans view on homosexuality is the absolute WRONG way to try to reach that group for Christ.
Regardless of whether we are hypocrital or bigoted in actuality, the perception matters a great deal.
I believe the same can also be said of the many anti-abortion bills that are being passed, as well as issues such as national healthcare and programs such as welfare. I believe Christians need to abandon the realm of political lobbying and return to the social circles, where we can first Rachel held evans view on homosexuality to non-Christians that we care about them as people, and then attempt to win them for Christ.
And what exactly are we supposed to do with these claims? I think the upshot is pretty clear. But I think Rachel held evans view on homosexuality made a legitimate point, and this response completely misses it. Smith may have a legitimate Rachel held evans view on homosexuality point about Millennials wanting the Church to relax the rules.
She was arguing that Millennials are frustrated by the ways the Church makes gays and lesbians unwelcome. Evans quotes the study by The Barna Group. Why should we privilege their perception or, even worse, regard it as reality?
Are some Christians anti-gay? My whole life I have belonged to conservative Rachel held evans view on homosexuality churches and attended an Evangelical liberal arts college. Never once did I hear a pastor, counselor, school administrator, or faculty member say anything remotely anti-gay, let alone
Rachel held evans view on homosexuality anything harmful toward gays. The biggest failing of the church, in my experience, is one of omission rather than commission: Christopher—I would agree that many Christians are compassionate.
And that it would be great for the Church to move in a fresh and fruitful direction of promoting the vocation of celibacy. I also can understand why the complaints of the church being anti-gay and fighting all the time can seem tiring after hearing it over and over. However, I would disagree on a couple of things:. I am not in that age Rachel held evans view on homosexuality, but Rachel held evans view on homosexuality share the concerns.
The concern is not about relaxing the rules. I have a conservative sexual ethic. What I object to is the whole ultra-conservative response to sin.
It is not a biblical response. The complaint is about the agitation and anger and lack of compassion exhibited in the public square by ultra-conservatives. One simple example of this is the way information is distorted. Gay people have suffered precisely because of the propaganda techniques used. I have to regularly reassure new female friends that I am not interested in them romantically. Even though I have been celibate for many years, I deal with the fall out of ultra-conservative rhetoric.
Even nice, polite Christians—even moderate Christians— will sometimes maintain some emotional distance from me even though
Rachel held evans view on homosexuality reality I live out far more sexual restraint than most of them. To say that the concerns are primarily about trying relax the rules is to completely and utterly miss the point. There are legitimate issues that still need to be addressed.
I mean something as subtle as someone at church giving you a handshake instead of a hug because of some lingering discomfort based on the effects of propaganda.
MORE: Mxq review uk dating