This site uses cookies. By continuing, your consent is assumed. Learn more

130.4m shares

Backdating of stock options is unethical because

opinion

Do you ever wish that you could turn back the hands of time? Some executives have, well, at least when it comes to their stock options.

Backdating of stock options is...

In order to lock in a profit on day one of an options grant, some executives simply backdate set the date to an earlier time than the actual grant date the exercise price of the options to a date when the stock was trading at a lower level.

This can often result in instantaneous profits! In this article, we'll explore what options backdating is and Backdating of stock options is unethical because it means for companies and their investors. Most businesses or executives avoid options backdating; executives who receive stock options as part of their compensation, are given an exercise price that is equivalent to the closing stock price on the date the options grant is issued.

This means they must wait for the stock to appreciate before making any money. Although it may appear shady, public companies can typically issue and price stock option grants as they see fit, but this will all depend on the terms and conditions of their stock option granting program. However, when granting Backdating of stock options is unethical because, the details of the grant must be disclosed, meaning that a company must clearly inform the investment community of the date that the option was Backdating of stock options is unethical because and the exercise price.

The facts cannot be made unclear or confusing.

Backdating of stock options is...

In addition, the company must also properly Backdating of stock options is unethical because for the expense of the options grant in their Backdating of stock options is unethical because. If the company sets the prices of the options grant well below the market price, they will instantaneously generate an expense, which counts against income.

The backdating concern occurs when the company does not disclose the facts behind the dating of the option. In short, it is this failure to disclose - rather than the backdating process itself - that is the crux of the options backdating scandal. To be clear, the majority of public companies handle their employee stock options programs in the traditional manner. That is, they grant their executives stock options with an Backdating of stock options is unethical because price or price at which the employee can purchase the common stock at a later date equivalent to the market price at the time of the option grant.

They also fully disclose this compensation to investors, and deduct the cost of issuing the options from their Backdating of stock options is unethical because as they are required to do under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of But, there are also some companies out there that have bent the rules by both hiding the backdating from investors, and also failing to book the grant s as an expense against earnings.

BREAKING DOWN 'Options Backdating'

On the surface - at least compared to some of the other shenanigans executives have been accused of in the past - the options backdating scandal seems relatively innocuous. But ultimately, it can prove to be quite costly to shareholders. Cost to Shareholders The biggest problem for most public companies will be the Backdating of stock options is unethical because press they receive after an accusation of backdating is levied, and the resulting drop in investor confidence.

While not quantifiable in terms of dollars and cents, in some cases, the damage to the Backdating of stock options is unethical because reputation could be irreparable. Another potential ticking time bomb, is that many of the companies that are Backdating of stock options is unethical because bending the rules will probably be required to restate their historical financials to reflect the costs associated with previous options grants.

In some cases, the amounts may be trivial. In others, the costs may be in the tens or even hundreds of millions of dollars. In a worst-case scenario, bad press and restatements may be the least of a company's worries. In this litigious society, shareholders will almost certainly file a class-action lawsuit against the company for filing false earnings reports.

The executives of companies involved in backdating scandals may also face a host of other penalties from a range of governmental bodies. Among the agencies that could be knocking on the door are the Justice Department for lying to investors, which is a crimeand the IRS for filing false tax returns.

Clearly, for those who own shares in companies that don't play by the Backdating of stock options is unethical because, options backdating poses serious risks. If the company is punished for its actions, its value is likely to drop substantially, putting a major dent in shareholders' portfolios. A Real-Life Example A perfect example of what can happen to companies that don't play by the rules can be found in a review of Brocade Communications. The well-known data storage company allegedly manipulated its stock options grants to ensure profits for its senior executives and then failed to inform investors, or to account for the options expense s properly.

In other words, Backdating of stock options is unethical because had to restate earnings. It has also been the subject of a civil and a criminal complaint. The total cost to shareholders, in this case, has been staggering.

Oct 7, Because stock options...

How Big Is the Problem? According to a study by Erik Lie at the University of Iowa, more than 2, companies used options backdating in some form to reward their senior executives between and In addition to Brocade, several other high profile companies have become embroiled Backdating of stock options is unethical because the backdating scandal as well. While reports of past indiscretions are likely to continue to surface, the good news is that companies will be less likely to mislead investors in the Backdating of stock options is unethical because. This is thanks to Sarbanes-Oxley.

Prior towhen the legislation was adopted, an executive didn't have to disclose their stock option grants until the end of the fiscal year in which the transaction or grant took place. However, since Sarbanes-Oxley, grants must Backdating of stock options is unethical because filed electronically within two business days of an issue or grant.

DEFINITION of 'Options Backdating'

This means that corporations will have less time to backdate their grants or pull any other behind-the-scenes trickery. It also provides investors with timely access to grant pricing information. It also approved requirements that mandate that companies outline the specifics of their compensation plans to their shareholders. No thanks, I prefer not making money.

News feed